Re: Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200106092032.f59KWkt28228@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Philip Crotwell <crotwell@seis.sc.edu> writes: > > I was vacuuming, but as the owner of the database. When I do that there > > are messages that should have clued me in, lke > > NOTICE: Skipping "pg_largeobject" --- only table owner can VACUUM it > > > From now on I will vacuum as user postgres, but I wonder if there is a > > need for individual users to be able to vacuum large obects by themselves. > > Good point. More generally, it seems like it might be a good idea to > allow the owner of an individual database to vacuum all the system > catalogs in it, even if he's not the superuser. Comments anyone? Seems db owner should be able to do whatever they want to the non-global system tables. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: