Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10019.992105998@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Crotwell <crotwell@seis.sc.edu> writes: > I was vacuuming, but as the owner of the database. When I do that there > are messages that should have clued me in, lke > NOTICE: Skipping "pg_largeobject" --- only table owner can VACUUM it > From now on I will vacuum as user postgres, but I wonder if there is a > need for individual users to be able to vacuum large obects by themselves. Good point. More generally, it seems like it might be a good idea to allow the owner of an individual database to vacuum all the system catalogs in it, even if he's not the superuser. Comments anyone? > Also, when the disk is nearly full, I am seeing the database crash while > trying to vacuum. From WAL log overflow, no doubt. If you look in the pgsql-patches archives from the last week or two, there is a patch to alleviate the growth of the log. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: