Re: Re: Use of the LIMIT clause ?

Is this a TODO item?  Seems we should match MySQL, seeing as we took the
feature syntax from them.

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:21:58PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Spy <spy@joystick.fr> writes:
> > > Tom Lane a ?crit :
> > >> Is that actually how MySQL interprets two parameters?  We treat them
> > >> as count and offset respectively, which definition I thought was the
> > >> same as MySQL's.
> > 
> > > But MySQL's syntax is different, as found on
> > > http://www.mysql.com/doc/S/E/SELECT.html : 
> > > "SELECT [STRAIGHT_JOIN] [SQL_SMALL_RESULT] [SQL_BIG_RESULT]
> > > [SQL_BUFFER_RESULT]
> > > [...]   
> > >         [LIMIT [offset,] rows]"
> > 
> > That's annoying; looks like we do it backwards from MySQL.  Can anyone
> > confirm that this is how MySQL behaves (maybe it's a typo on this
> > documentation page)?
> 
> Yes, it does behave as documented.
> 
> > Should we consider changing ours if it is different?
> 
> I don't know that it's worth it... it seems to inconvenience some
> people either way. I may soon be moving a moderately complex system
> from MySQL to Postgres and it wouldn't be the end of my world if
> I had to reverse all the LIMITs.
> 
> Richard
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026