Re: Re: Use of the LIMIT clause ?
От | Richard Poole |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Use of the LIMIT clause ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010313150752.A13549@office.vi.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Use of the LIMIT clause ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Use of the LIMIT clause ?
Re: Re: Use of the LIMIT clause ? |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:21:58PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Spy <spy@joystick.fr> writes: > > Tom Lane a écrit : > >> Is that actually how MySQL interprets two parameters? We treat them > >> as count and offset respectively, which definition I thought was the > >> same as MySQL's. > > > But MySQL's syntax is different, as found on > > http://www.mysql.com/doc/S/E/SELECT.html : > > "SELECT [STRAIGHT_JOIN] [SQL_SMALL_RESULT] [SQL_BIG_RESULT] > > [SQL_BUFFER_RESULT] > > [...] > > [LIMIT [offset,] rows]" > > That's annoying; looks like we do it backwards from MySQL. Can anyone > confirm that this is how MySQL behaves (maybe it's a typo on this > documentation page)? Yes, it does behave as documented. > Should we consider changing ours if it is different? I don't know that it's worth it... it seems to inconvenience some people either way. I may soon be moving a moderately complex system from MySQL to Postgres and it wouldn't be the end of my world if I had to reverse all the LIMITs. Richard
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: