Re: Now 376175 lines of code

Never mind.  I see I ran it already on 7.0 and got 376k.  You used my
idential script to get these numbers.  I will use your nice numbers for
a presentation at the show in two weeks.  Thanks a lot.



> On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:45:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > I did a distclean on 7.0, and ran 'wc' on all the *.[chly] files, and
> > > got a much larger number than what we got from Berkeley.
> > >     376175
> > > Seems someone has been busy.  :-)
> > 
> > Forgive a newbie --- what was the count for the original Berkeley code?
> > Do you have the same numbers for other milestones?
> 
> Not that I'm a big believer in kloc as a measure of productivity (oh,
> Bruce just said busy, didn't he? That's a different story...), I happen
> to have a couple historical trees laying around, starting with the last
> one I found at Berkeley:
> 
>   postgres-v4r2           244581
>   postgres95-1.09         178976
>   postgresql-6.1.1        200709
>   postgresql-6.3.2        260809
>   postgresql-6.4.0        297479
>   postgresql-6.4.2        297918
>   postgresql-6.5.3        331278   
> 
> Well, more than a couple trees, I guess (actually I unpacked tarballs
> for most of these)
> 
> HTH,
> Ross
> -- 
> Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> 
> NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
> Computer and Information Technology Institute
> Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026