Re: Now 376175 lines of code
От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Now 376175 lines of code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000511102342.B10872@rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Now 376175 lines of code (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Now 376175 lines of code
Re: Now 376175 lines of code |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:45:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I did a distclean on 7.0, and ran 'wc' on all the *.[chly] files, and > > got a much larger number than what we got from Berkeley. > > 376175 > > Seems someone has been busy. :-) > > Forgive a newbie --- what was the count for the original Berkeley code? > Do you have the same numbers for other milestones? Not that I'm a big believer in kloc as a measure of productivity (oh, Bruce just said busy, didn't he? That's a different story...), I happen to have a couple historical trees laying around, starting with the last one I found at Berkeley: postgres-v4r2 244581 postgres95-1.09 178976 postgresql-6.1.1 200709 postgresql-6.3.2 260809postgresql-6.4.0 297479 postgresql-6.4.2 297918 postgresql-6.5.3 331278 Well, more than a couple trees, I guess (actually I unpacked tarballs for most of these) HTH, Ross -- Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer Computer and Information Technology Institute Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: