Re: Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses

On 3/24/17 10:50 AM, David Steele wrote:
> Hi Pritam,
>
> On 3/17/17 5:41 PM, Pritam Baral wrote:
>>
>> So sorry. I'm attaching the correct version of the original with this,
>> in case you want to test the limited implementation, because I still
>> have to go through Tom's list of suggestions.
>>
>> BTW, the patch is for applying on top of REL9_6_2, and while I
>> suspect it may work on master too, I haven't tested it since the
>> original submission (Feb 23).
>>
>>> Also, I noticed that patch haven't regression tests.  Some mention of
>>> this optimization in docs is also nice to have.  > > ------ >
>>> Alexander Korotkov > Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
>>> > The Russian Postgres Company
>
> This thread has been idle for a week.  Please respond and/or post a new
> patch by 2017-03-28 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this submission will be marked
> "Returned with Feedback".

This submission has been marked "Returned with Feedback".  Please feel 
free to resubmit to a future commitfest.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net