Re: Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0cb8d6c6-7953-beeb-8240-3007e59798bc@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses (Pritam Baral <pritam@pritambaral.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Pritam, On 3/17/17 5:41 PM, Pritam Baral wrote: > > So sorry. I'm attaching the correct version of the original with this, > in case you want to test the limited implementation, because I still > have to go through Tom's list of suggestions. > > BTW, the patch is for applying on top of REL9_6_2, and while I > suspect it may work on master too, I haven't tested it since the > original submission (Feb 23). > >> Also, I noticed that patch haven't regression tests. Some mention of >> this optimization in docs is also nice to have. > > ------ > >> Alexander Korotkov > Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com >> > The Russian Postgres Company This thread has been idle for a week. Please respond and/or post a new patch by 2017-03-28 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this submission will be marked "Returned with Feedback". Thanks, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: