Re: Index Backward Scan fast / Index Scan slow ! (Modifié par Pailloncy Jean-Gérard)
От | Pailloncy Jean-Gérard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index Backward Scan fast / Index Scan slow ! (Modifié par Pailloncy Jean-Gérard) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1D4DEBDC-8CB4-11D8-80FD-000A95DE2550@ifrance.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Index Backward Scan fast / Index Scan slow ! (Modifié par Pailloncy Jean-Gérard)
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, > In 7.4 a VACUUM should be sufficient ... or at least, if it isn't Atfer VACUUM: dps=# explain analyze select next_index_time from url order by next_index_time desc limit 1; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Limit (cost=0.00..2.62 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.098..0.099 rows=1 loops=1) -> Index Scan Backward using url_next_index_time on url (cost=0.00..814591.03 rows=310913 width=4) (actual time=0.096..0.096 rows=1 loops=1) Total runtime: 0.195 ms (3 rows) dps=# explain analyze select next_index_time from url order by next_index_time asc limit 1; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Limit (cost=0.00..2.62 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=13504.105..13504.106 rows=1 loops=1) -> Index Scan using url_next_index_time on url (cost=0.00..814591.03 rows=310913 width=4) (actual time=13504.099..13504.099 rows=1 loops=1) Total runtime: 13504.158 ms (3 rows) Better, but...... Cordialement, Jean-Gérard Pailloncy
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: