Re: subquery/alias question
От | Michael Glaesemann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: subquery/alias question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1AC876D7-C4C5-4EDB-B0B8-A632A8243415@seespotcode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: subquery/alias question (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: subquery/alias question
Re: subquery/alias question |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sep 25, 2007, at 17:30 , Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Michael Glaesemann wrote: >> >> select dom_id, >> dom_name, >> usr_count >> from domains >> natural join (select usr_dom_id as dom_id, >> count(usr_dom_id) as usr_count >> from users) u >> where usr_count > 0 >> order by dom_name; > > Maybe the usr_count should be tested in a HAVING clause instead of > WHERE? And put the count(*) in the result list instead of a > subselect. > That feels more natural to me anyway. I believe you'd have to write it like select dom_id, dom_name, count(usr_dom_id) as usr_count from domains join users on (usr_dom_id = dom_id) having count(usr_dom_id) > 0 order by dom_name; I don't know how the performance would compare. I think the backend is smart enough to know it doesn't need to perform two seq scans to calculate count(usr_dom_id), but I wasn't sure. Madison, how do the two queries compare with explain analyze? Michael Glaesemann grzm seespotcode net
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: