Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199911182335.SAA18215@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 05:41:36PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > * Since no one has picked up on my idea to run the tests directly on the > > > backend, I will keep reiterating this idea until someone shuts me up > > > :*) The idea would be to have a target "check" in the top level makefile > > > like this (conceptually): > > > > Running the backend standalone does not use locking with other backends, > > so it is dangerous. > > Bruce, how dos this apply to Peter's suggestion? We're talking about > _regression_ tests. Things to do after changing the code. Do you often > recompile, and run regression tests against a db with a (now out of date) > postmaster running against it? Do other developers? I'd have thought a > complete shutdown/restart is part of the cycle anyway. has to be if an > initdb is in there of course. Checking to make sure a postmaster isn't > running could be added to Peter's script, just to be sure. Regression tests are often run by end-users as part of the install. I can imagine someone seeing a problem and running the regression tests while having running backends to see if everything is still working. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: