Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19991118171333.A18543@wallace.ece.rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 05:41:36PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > * Since no one has picked up on my idea to run the tests directly on the > > backend, I will keep reiterating this idea until someone shuts me up > > :*) The idea would be to have a target "check" in the top level makefile > > like this (conceptually): > > Running the backend standalone does not use locking with other backends, > so it is dangerous. Bruce, how dos this apply to Peter's suggestion? We're talking about _regression_ tests. Things to do after changing the code. Do you often recompile, and run regression tests against a db with a (now out of date) postmaster running against it? Do other developers? I'd have thought a complete shutdown/restart is part of the cycle anyway. has to be if an initdb is in there of course. Checking to make sure a postmaster isn't running could be added to Peter's script, just to be sure. Ross -- Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer Computer and Information Technology Institute Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: