Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]

> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> More importantly, though, any bugs in the Makefile or
> >> whatever will be noticed early by developers and won't wait until the
> >> last moment.  Since the basic installation scheme likely doesn't
> >> depend much on the exact pgaccess release, there really isn't much to
> >> be lost by keeping it in the development tree.
> 
> > It is in the development tree, just not the most recent version.
> 
> But the point is, if the most recent version had been in the development
> tree, we'd have had a better shot at noticing that its makefile was
> missing...
> 

I guess.  The new pgaccess release was so different than the current
one, I just cvs removed all files, and readded everything.  That is how
Makefile go lost.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026