Re: [SQL] Column name's length
От | Zalman Stern |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] Column name's length |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199906010733.AAA00923@netcom12.netcom.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [SQL] Column name's length (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [SQL] Column name's length
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
> And I assume it is working fine? Yes. It fixes the column length too I think. The following is a psql interaction: ----- ssmldb=> create table more_than_64_bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb (more_than_32_bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb boolean ) ; CREATE ssmldb=> select * from more_than_64_bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ; more_than_32_bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb --------------------------------------------- (0 rows) ssmldb=> insert into more_than_64_bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ( more_than_32_bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ) values ( true ) ; INSERT 25353 1 ssmldb=> select * from more_than_64_bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ; ^Mmore_than_32_bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb --------------------------------------------- t (1 row) ----- (I did some tests to make sure all the characters are significant. They are.) Here are the two diffs that up the "name size" from 32 characters to 256 characters. (Once I get bit, I try to fix things real good so I don't get bit again :-)) ----- diff postgresql-6.4.2/src/include/postgres_ext.h postgres-build/src/include/postgres_ext.h 34c34 < #define NAMEDATALEN 32 --- > #define NAMEDATALEN 256 37c37 < #define OIDNAMELEN 36 --- > #define OIDNAMELEN 260 ----- diff postgresql-6.4.2/src/include/storage/buf_internals.h postgres-build/src/include/storage/buf_internals.h 87c87 < #define PADDED_SBUFDESC_SIZE 128 --- > #define PADDED_SBUFDESC_SIZE 1024 ----- After this, I did a clean build. I am pretty sure this produces a Postgres that *is not* binary compatible with existing databases. You have to do the dump/reload thing. (We discovered this issue very early on so I was able to trash all my existing databases and start from scratch.) I do not know what performance or space usage impact this has. If it is not too terrible, this would be a great change to see in a future version of Postgres. -Z-
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: