Re: [SQL] Column name's length

> I recompiled my server with support for longer (128 character max) table
> names. (This was a bit tricky because you have to change things in two
> places.) 32 character limits are rather low. 64 or 128 are more reasonable.
> (Yes, I know this is controversial. The problem I was having is analogous
> to the SERIAL problem: table names are made by concatenating together a few
> fields. Each of thee fields can reasonably be 15 or 20 characters. So while
> 32 characters is fine for a single human generated identifier, it is not
> long enough for other purposes.)

And I assume it is working fine?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026