Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question

Older patch reversed out, and new patch applied.

Thanks.

[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> This is another example of why not allowing utility functions in SPI would
> be a Bad Thing.
> 
> For what it's worth, I found another case in libpq where you can get a T
> message without a D that my utility patch needs to handle.  I have attached
> the updated patch against the 6.4.2 version of
> src/interfaces/libpq/fe-exec.c
> 
> Jerry
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jwieck@debis.com [SMTP:jwieck@debis.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 05, 1999 3:00 AM
> > To: Michael Davis
> > Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question
> >
> > >
> >
> >     Second  REVOKE and GRANT are utility statements not supported
> >     for prepared SPI plans and  thus  PL/pgSQL  currently  cannot
> >     execute them.
> >
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >#======================================================================#
> > # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being
> >right. #
> > # Let's break this rule - forgive me.
> >#
> > #======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan
> >Wieck) #
> >

[Attachment, skipping...]


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026