Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question
От | Gerald L. Gay |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 010401be6783$95bd9940$9a028a8f@2isdt54.korea.army.mil обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
This is another example of why not allowing utility functions in SPI would be a Bad Thing. For what it's worth, I found another case in libpq where you can get a T message without a D that my utility patch needs to handle. I have attached the updated patch against the 6.4.2 version of src/interfaces/libpq/fe-exec.c Jerry > -----Original Message----- > From: jwieck@debis.com [SMTP:jwieck@debis.com] > Sent: Friday, March 05, 1999 3:00 AM > To: Michael Davis > Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question > > > > > Second REVOKE and GRANT are utility statements not supported > for prepared SPI plans and thus PL/pgSQL currently cannot > execute them. > > > Jan > > -- > > >#======================================================================# > # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being >right. # > # Let's break this rule - forgive me. ># > #======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan >Wieck) # >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: