Re: SCO vs. the monster macro
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCO vs. the monster macro |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199803122115.QAA06535@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SCO vs. the monster macro (Hal Snyder <hal@vailsys.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > But we don't want that if they use a good compiler under SCO. I have > > asked them to run src/tools/ccsym and send the output. Should be > > something unique in there. > > On SCO, ccsym becomes /bin/cc -b elf -ii -E foo.c, which after filtering > gives the symbols below. If I omit "-b elf", the last line is replaced > by the two lines > '-D_M_COFF' > '-D_SCO_COFF' > > How about _SCO_DS as the define when testing for SCO's native > compiler? (I confess ignorance as to SCO's intended use of this symbol.) I am inclined to choose: -D_SCO_C_DIALECT=1 Not to test for the value of one, but just to test if it is defined. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: