SCO vs. the monster macro
От | Hal Snyder |
---|---|
Тема | SCO vs. the monster macro |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199803122055.OAA23869@crocodile.vail обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c?] (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] SCO vs. the monster macro
Re: SCO vs. the monster macro |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> But we don't want that if they use a good compiler under SCO. I have > asked them to run src/tools/ccsym and send the output. Should be > something unique in there. On SCO, ccsym becomes /bin/cc -b elf -ii -E foo.c, which after filtering gives the symbols below. If I omit "-b elf", the last line is replaced by the two lines '-D_M_COFF' '-D_SCO_COFF' How about _SCO_DS as the define when testing for SCO's native compiler? (I confess ignorance as to SCO's intended use of this symbol.) '-D__i386' '-D_SCO_DS=1' '-D__unix' '-D_M_I386' '-D_M_XENIX' '-D_M_UNIX' '-D_SCO_C_DIALECT=1' '-D_STRICT_NAMES' '-D_M_I86' '-D_M_I86SM' '-D_M_SDATA' '-D_M_STEXT' '-D_M_BITFIELDS' '-D_M_INTERNAT' '-D_M_SYS5' '-D_M_SYSV' '-D_M_SYSIII' '-D_M_WORDSWAP' '-Di386' '-Dunix' '-DM_I386' '-DM_UNIX' '-DM_XENIX' '-D_SCO_XPG_VERS=4' '-D_SCO_ELF'
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: