Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19521.1248738292@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Oh? You think RH/Cent is going to change that default now? Think again. > I thought they would get around to changing it now. "They" is me, and it's not changing. I'm not blowing a chance at in-place upgrade to switch the integer-timestamp default. > because RH really can't be used as a production PostgreSQL server (if > date based data is important) I have open bugs about the lack of in-place upgrade. I have never once heard a customer complain about FP timestamps. So your position is nonsense. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: