Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1248737946.14534.23.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > It depends, 8.3 and 8.4 are not compatible by default (because of > > --integer-datetimes). So, yeah if you are running Debian/Ubuntu but if > > you are running Cent/RH with the defaults, pg_migrator isn't going to > > work unless you compile Pg from source. > > Oh? You think RH/Cent is going to change that default now? Think again. > I thought they would get around to changing it now. That is a shame because RH really can't be used as a production PostgreSQL server (if date based data is important) unless you recompile or install the --integer-datetime rpms. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: