Re: pg_dump and pgpool
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and pgpool |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18331.1104359598@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and pgpool (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump and pgpool
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes: > On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 16:11, Tom Lane wrote: >> I would like to know exactly what pgpool has done to break pg_dump. > What's happening is that there are two databases behind pgpool, and each > has managed to assign a different (set of) OID(s) to the table(s). So, > when pg_dump asks for an OID, it gets two different ones. Mph. I'd have zero confidence in a dump taken under such circumstances, anyway. If pgpool can't duplicate OIDs (which I agree it probably can't) then it's unlikely to be able to make the databases match closely enough to satisfy pg_dump in other ways. I'd worry about synchronization issues to start with... I don't think we should make pg_dump slower and possibly less reliable in order to support a fundamentally dangerous administration procedure. Run pg_dump directly into the database, not through pgpool. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: