Re: pg_dump and pgpool
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and pgpool |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1104358774.5893.18.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and pgpool (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump and pgpool
Re: pg_dump and pgpool |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 16:11, Tom Lane wrote: > Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes: > > I've noticed today that if one tries to pg_dump a database cluster > > running under pgpool, one gets the error message: > > > pg_dump: query to get table columns failed: ERROR: kind mismatch > > between backends > > HINT: check data consistency between master and secondary > > I would like to know exactly what pgpool has done to break pg_dump. What's happening is that there are two databases behind pgpool, and each has managed to assign a different (set of) OID(s) to the table(s). So, when pg_dump asks for an OID, it gets two different ones. > > Looking at the SQL that pg_dump sends to be relying on object OIDs for > > the dump. > > There is nothing wrong with that technique ... What I'd want is for it to use a join IN the database so that at no time are OIDs floating across the ether or seen by pg_dump.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: