Re: Darwin compile fixes
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Darwin compile fixes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17543.1129177736@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Darwin compile fixes (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Darwin compile fixes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Attached is a cleaned up version of the patch (without wrapping). The > change is to use "$(CXX) $(CFLAGS)" instead of $(COMPILER). Does this > change break OS/X? Since our configure doesn't define CXX, I'm having a hard time imagining how it could fail to break it. If we *did* define CXX, it would presumably point to g++, which would also break things since our source code is not C++ clean. Even more to the point, Darwin isn't broken now --- at least it works fine on the powerbook I'm typing this on, and on the several OSX machines in the buildfarm. I would like to know what this patch is alleged to fix before even considering applying it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: