Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
От | John Sidney-Woollett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1405.192.168.0.64.1074792638.squirrel@mercury.wardbrook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane said: > The planned PITR feature would not require you to take anything offline. > The whole concept of an "offline" database is an Oracle-ism that I see > no value in emulating. > I dunno what a "dump file" would equate to in Postgres terms, but yeah, > we're envisioning using ordinary filesystem tools (tar, say) as the > mechanism for handling a baseline backup. (I think) that was the point I was trying to make. Oracle lets you backup while up and running (using export) OR when offline (copying db files)... However, it looks like postgres will require a file system level backup to recover from. Or will you be able to build a new db from the dump file, and then apply the WAL segments? John Sidney-Woollett
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: