Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12954.1074792270@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5? ("John Sidney-Woollett" <johnsw@wardbrook.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"John Sidney-Woollett" <johnsw@wardbrook.com> writes: > With Oracle you have the option of EITHER exporting the database > (equivalent to doing pg_dump) OR taking the database offline and carrying > out a file system level copy of the database files. The planned PITR feature would not require you to take anything offline. The whole concept of an "offline" database is an Oracle-ism that I see no value in emulating. > One caveat for Oracle (at least in 8.1.x) is that DDL statements are not > recorded in the archive logs, and can screw things up. Best to take a new > export/dump after making DDL changes! Well, we're ahead of them on that... > The difference between Oracle and Postgres appears to be that posgres > requires a file system level copy of the database instead of being able to > make use of a dump file for this type of recovery. Is that correct? I dunno what a "dump file" would equate to in Postgres terms, but yeah, we're envisioning using ordinary filesystem tools (tar, say) as the mechanism for handling a baseline backup. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: