Re: Backporting BackgroundPsql

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> Before pulling any triggers I think https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4959/
> should be considered, since Tom found some flaws in the current code around how
> timers and timeouts are used.

That's certainly another issue to consider, but is it really a blocker
for this one?

> However, since Andrew is actively aiming to replace all of this shortly, should
> we wait a see where that lands to avoid having to backport another library
> change?

I would like to see what he comes up with ... but is it likely to
be something we'd risk back-patching?

            regards, tom lane