Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13573.1281622963@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On ons, 2010-08-11 at 16:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> We should have the buildfarm configuration such that any one run uses >> the same port number for both installed and uninstalled regression >> tests. > I'm getting lost here what the actual requirements are. The above is > obviously not going to work as a default for pg_regress, because the > port number for an installed test is determined by the user and is > likely to be in the public range, whereas the uninstalled test should > use something from the private range. Certainly, but the buildfarm's "installed" test doesn't try to start on 5432. It starts on whatever branch_port the buildfarm owner has specified for that animal and that branch. It's the owner's responsibility to make that nonconflicting across the services and buildfarm critters he has running on a given machine. What I'm saying is that *in the buildfarm* we want the "make check" case to also use this predetermined safe port number. That has nothing whatever to do with what is good practice for other cases. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: