Re: location of Unix socket
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: location of Unix socket |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12335.975359068@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: location of Unix socket (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: location of Unix socket
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Am I handling this properly? I hate to be dragging around the unix > socket directory name in pghost for too long and hate to be propogating > the slash test throughout the code. It's probably cleanest to do that the way you are doing it. However, one could argue we should make PQhost() returnpghost ? pghost : pgunixsocket which'd make the external behavior compatible with the way one specifies the connection. Basically, the idea was to *not* have a distinct unixsocket spec anywhere in libpq's external API, so that existing apps wouldn't need a rewrite to support this feature. Keeping unixsocket separate inside the library is a good idea, but it's independent of the API. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: