Re: [Fwd: Re: dblink patches for comment]
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Fwd: Re: dblink patches for comment] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12129.1244310667@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Fwd: Re: dblink patches for comment] (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Fwd: Re: dblink patches for comment]
Re: [Fwd: Re: dblink patches for comment] |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> you will need to whip up a special-purpose quoting subroutine. > OK, I see that. I assume I need to care for encoding issues? If so, do I > assume server encoding or client encoding? Hoo, good point. You can assume the database (server) encoding, because that's what the local encoding is from the point of view of libpq --- and the code in conninfo_parse knows nothing of encodings anyway. So that's a no-op as far as the quoting itself goes. But that reminds me, weren't you going to add something to force libpq to set client_encoding to the database encoding? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: