Re: User Wiki
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: User Wiki |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1203869908.31387.9.camel@mha-laptop.clients.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: User Wiki ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 08:04 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Dave Page wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 01:49 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > >> > So I was thinking some more about the lack of real use that techdocs > >> > is getting coupled with the lack of any kind of spam etc. that we've > >> > picked up on it. I think we should reconsider having an official > >> > PostgreSQL wiki for users, probably at wiki.postgresql.org. > >> > > >> > Thoughts? > >> > >> I guess I'll have to concede. It's quite clear that the techdocs we have > >> now doesn't work the way we intended. I'm not entirely convinced that a > >> wiki will work much better, but since others are, let's give it a shot. > > > > Hey, that was easier than I expected. > > You know, a group of people gave up on -www ever conceding this and > created its own wiki? We were keeping it quiet because we didn't have > all the template work etc.. done. It is over at www.postgresqldocs.org. > > And before people point at me... It was Greg Smith's idea. I just helped > so shoot him first, it gives me 3 steps to get away. I'll just not shoot anybody, but refer back to most of the arguments about domains, and user account, and management, that has been made about a billion times previously. I have nothing new to add above that (apart from what I already added, which is that techdocs doesn't work as well as we (or at least I) thought, and therefor making another approach would be a good idea. It just comes naturally that doing said approach along established policies is something I would advocate, but that's just me) //Magnus //Magnus
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: