Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
| От | Mark Lewis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1150322085.31200.39.camel@archimedes обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp (Dan Gorman <dgorman@hi5.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
No. You need fsync on in order to force the data to get TO the NetApp at the right time. With fsync off, the data gets cached in the operating system. -- Mark Lewis On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 14:48 -0700, Dan Gorman wrote: > All, > So I thought I'd pose this question: > > If I have a pg database attached to a powervault (PV) with just an > off-the-shelf SCSI card I generally want fsync on to prevent data > corruption in case the PV should loose power. > However, if I have it attached to a NetApp that ensures data writes > to via the NVRAM can I safely turn fsync off to gain additional > performance? > > Best Regards, > Dan Gorman > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: