Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 111019.1612544511@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems ("Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
"Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com> writes: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021, at 12:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> ReFS is Microsoft's latest and greatest attempt at implementing a modern >> file system. I'd quantify the greatness pretty poorly if they left out >> hard links (I wonder what other essentials they didn't bother with) >> but maybe we have to support it. > It claims that the latest ReFS version (3.5) supports hard links [1]. Hmm, what [1] actually says about that is Version ReFS 3.5 formatted by Windows 10 Enterprise Insider Preview build 19536. Added hardlink support if fresh formatted volume. Can't use hardlink if upgraded from previous version so it's not exactly mainstream yet. But given that, I'm content to say "you can use ReFS if you have a version that supports hard links". We don't need to support work-in-progress filesystems. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: