Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems
От | Euler Taveira |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0d8da46b-e35b-45cc-a674-2a0678aa8bc6@www.fastmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021, at 12:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
ReFS is Microsoft's latest and greatest attempt at implementing a modernfile system. I'd quantify the greatness pretty poorly if they left outhard links (I wonder what other essentials they didn't bother with)but maybe we have to support it.
It claims that the latest ReFS version (3.5) supports hard links [1].
On the third hand, Wikipedia says a bit further downThe ability to create ReFS volumes was removed in Windows 10's 2017Fall Creators Update for all editions except Enterprise and Pro forWorkstations.[4]which sounds a whole lot like "we've already given up on this".If they're not pushing ReFS anymore then I think we can ignore it.
It is not clear why they removed the ability to create ReFS filesystems in some
Windows 10 versions. Strategic decision? Even we fixed support for ReFS, they
would be a mess to explain that a previous created ReFS filesystem doesn't
support hard links and the OP should create a new one (unless MS provides a way
to figure out that filesystem doesn't support hard links because it was created
in a previous version).
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: