Re: Add regression coverage for REVOKE ADMIN OPTION
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add regression coverage for REVOKE ADMIN OPTION |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0DE9BC11-13C4-4570-9199-7DD02CCEC055@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add regression coverage for REVOKE ADMIN OPTION (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add regression coverage for REVOKE ADMIN OPTION
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Nov 16, 2021, at 6:31 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > >> On 16 Nov 2021, at 00:58, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> While working on a fix for dangling references to dropped roles in the pg_auth_members.grantor field, I happened to noticewe entirely lack regression test coverage of the REVOKE ADMIN OPTION FOR form of the RevokeRoleStmt. I am unawareof any bugs in the current implementation, but future work on roles may benefit if we close the testing gap. > > LGTM. Reading this I realized that the GRANTED BY keyword for RevokeRoleStmt > isn't working as documented, it's not checking the role at all. I've sent a > diff for that with tests on the relevant thread, but I think it would be a good > to get this in too to boost coverage. Thanks for the review! — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: