RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001201bec290$9d1300a0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 6.5.1 status (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 11:11 AM > To: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status > > > We are two weeks after the 6.5 release, and the anticipated > problems/patches/porting issues never really materialized. > > I would suspect that fewer people are using PostgreSQL, but I know that > is not true. Seems the two months of beta really got out the bugs. > > What do people want to do now? Does anyone want to start on 6.6? Do we > want to release 6.5.1? Should we relax for a few more weeks and bask in > the stable release? > > I am looking for comments. > I have 2 questions for 6.5.1. 1. Currently we couldn't create an index on numeric type. Is it difficult to add numeric_ops ? 2. I love Oracle TRUNCATE statement. Marcus Mascari [mascarim@yahoo.com] has already implemented this feature,thoughI haven't seen his implementation yet. If his implementation is right,could this new feature be added to 6.5.1 ? Regards. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: