Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> As a potential follow-up, is there any interest in switching the
> Cirrus Meson setup to explicitly enable the features that we expect to
> test? That would match what we do for Autoconf, I think; it would have
> helped me catch my mistake earlier.
As far as I recall, we've always thought that autoconf's approach
of "explicitly specify the features you expect to get" is the
right way to do things. I don't love meson's default you-get-
whatever-seems-available approach at all, though maybe that's
my history as a package builder talking. I think not using that
behavior would be a real good idea, at least for testing purposes.
regards, tom lane