Обсуждение: Re: pgsql: Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection
On 2025-Jan-13, Melanie Plageman wrote: > Since I didn't hear back about this and I don't see an obvious > alternative reorganization in guc_tables.c, I plan to just push the > attached patch that updates only postgresql.conf.sample. Apologies, I was very unclear -- I didn't want to talk about the ordering of entries in the code, but the categorization. See the config_group_names list in guc_tables.c, which defines some groups. Each setting belongs into a group, and those groups correspond to what the sample config file lists as section/subsection titles and to the grouping in the docs. Also, this categorization affects how the entries are listed in the pg_settings view and in "postgres --describe-config", which feed from the same tables. Perhaps with your changes (assuming I read your commit message right), we need new groups: VACUUMING VACUUMING_FREEZING VACUUMING_AUTOVACUUM Thanks -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Doing what he did amounts to sticking his fingers under the hood of the implementation; if he gets his fingers burnt, it's his problem." (Tom Lane)
Hi!
On 14.01.2025 01:35, Melanie Plageman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 3:46 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:On 2025-Jan-13, Melanie Plageman wrote:Since I didn't hear back about this and I don't see an obvious alternative reorganization in guc_tables.c, I plan to just push the attached patch that updates only postgresql.conf.sample.Apologies, I was very unclear -- I didn't want to talk about the ordering of entries in the code, but the categorization. See the config_group_names list in guc_tables.c, which defines some groups. Each setting belongs into a group, and those groups correspond to what the sample config file lists as section/subsection titles and to the grouping in the docs. Also, this categorization affects how the entries are listed in the pg_settings view and in "postgres --describe-config", which feed from the same tables.Oh dear, I had no idea that these categories existed. I suppose I never paid attention to the category column in pg_settings nor used --describe-config. Attached is a patch to fix this. I checked both pg_settings and --describe-config output, and it seems to work. I'm quite sorry about the extra noise this is causing (especially for people with patch sets requiring rebasing).Perhaps with your changes (assuming I read your commit message right), we need new groups: VACUUMING VACUUMING_FREEZING VACUUMING_AUTOVACUUMI've gone with VACUUM_AUTOVACUUM, VACUUM_COST_DELAY, and VACUUM_FREEZING, but I am open to feedback.
Looks good and convenient, thanks for the patch!
I noticed another guc autovacuum_work_mem, which belongs more to the autovacuum category in my opinion, although it belongs to RESOURCES_MEM, but in fact, only autovacuum uses it.
-- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres Professional