Обсуждение: Numeric Type Precision Not Respected in Function or Procedure Arguments
When a NUMERIC type is used as a function or procedure argument, the value does not actually follow the user-defined precision, such as NUMERIC(10,4). It does not round off the value to the specified scale or check for an overflow error. Return type of function also does not respect precision. This does not apply to the declared variables, which have the expected behaviour. Tables, custom types, and explicit casting also all have the expected behaviour for me, rounding the value off and checking for overflow. Version: PostgreSQL 16.2 (Ubuntu 16.2-1.pgdg22.04+1) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0, 64-bit ``` CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION numericsTestingFunction( input NUMERIC(4,3)) RETURNS NUMERIC(4,3) LANGUAGE plpgsql STABLE AS $$ BEGIN RETURN input; END; $$; -- Returns 98765.123456789, but expected error SELECT * FROM numericsTestingFunction(98765.123456789); -- Returns 5.123456789, but expected 5.123 SELECT * FROM numericsTestingFunction(5.123456789); CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE numericsTestingProcedure( input NUMERIC(4,3)) LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$ DECLARE declared NUMERIC(4,3); BEGIN SELECT input INTO declared; RAISE NOTICE 'Input value: %, Into declared: %', input, declared; END; $$; -- Raises: 'Input value: 5.123456789, Into declared: 5.123' -- Expected: 'Input value: 5.1234, Into declared: 5.123' CALL numericsTestingProcedure(5.123456789); DROP FUNCTION numericsTestingFunction; DROP PROCEDURE numericsTestingProcedure; ```
Aaron Ackerman <aackerman@goodmorning.com> writes: > When a NUMERIC type is used as a function or procedure argument, the > value does not actually follow the user-defined precision, such as > NUMERIC(10,4). It does not round off the value to the specified scale > or check for an overflow error. Return type of function also does not > respect precision. This is documented. See for example in [1]: The full SQL type syntax is allowed for declaring a function's arguments and return value. However, parenthesized type modifiers (e.g., the precision field for type numeric) are discarded by CREATE FUNCTION. Thus for example CREATE FUNCTION foo (varchar(10)) ... is exactly the same as CREATE FUNCTION foo (varchar) .... Perhaps we should reject type modifiers in CREATE FUNCTION, since people do get confused about this. (The alternative of actually doing something with them is in aint-gonna-happen territory, I think.) regards, tom lane [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createfunction.html
Re: Numeric Type Precision Not Respected in Function or Procedure Arguments
От
"David G. Johnston"
Дата:
On Monday, September 22, 2025, Aaron Ackerman <aackerman@goodmorning.com> wrote:
When a NUMERIC type is used as a function or procedure argument, the
value does not actually follow the user-defined precision, such as
NUMERIC(10,4).
This is a known limitation - the “typmod” (type modifier) is not stored in the metadata for a function’s interface.
Pretty sure it’s documented but not able to go hunting for it at the moment.
David J.