Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> writes:
> Hmm
>
> So these functions were created from macros in commit 34694ec888d6,
> which themselves had been added for the first time in commit
> 37484ad2aace. However, it appears that they were added only because
> they were mirroring HeapTupleHeaderSetXminFrozen(), and while the latter
> was immediately used, the other two weren't and never have been.
>
> (For a short while between June and September 2002 we had a different
> macro also called HeapTupleHeaderSetXminInvalid -- added by commit
> 3c35face4108 and removed by commit c7a165adc64e -- and curiously enough
> it was also entirely unused.)
Thanks for checking the history, and part of c7a165adc64e (removing
HeapTupleHeaderSetXminInvalid from htup.h) is pretty similar with the
case there.
> I think Andy is right that these should be removed, not only because
> they are unsafe but because they are dead code.
Yes, I suggested with the two reasons. When I knew removing a public
API has potential to break some third-party extension even they are not
used in core, then the *unsafe* part encourage to do so.
Acutally no maintaince cost for the dead code is only true when no one
read/think about them, otherwise the cost is there. The
HeapTupleheaderSetXminCommitted has misleaded me to think I can do
something there, but the fact is (1) they are never used. (2) the right
place is SetHintBits.
> codesearch.debian.net shows no matches by grep, other than
> htup_internals.h itself.
Thanks for sharing codesearch.decbian.net which looks a great project.
I just found even there is such code, core has already provided public
API HeapTupleSetHintBits which can be used as a replacement and it is
safe.
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan