Обсуждение: BUG #18225: chdb's s3 table function crashes postgresql with plpython3
BUG #18225: chdb's s3 table function crashes postgresql with plpython3
От
PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 18225 Logged by: Bing Sun Email address: subi.the.dream.walker@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 16.0 Operating system: AlmaLinux-9.2 Description: Hi, I am playing around chdb (https://github.com/chdb-io/chdb), which is an embedded clickhouse engine. The python binding of chdb enables the usage with plpython3. The following anonymous block causes a server termination: ======= do language plpython3u $$ import chdb chdb.query(sql='''select * from s3('https://datasets-documentation.s3.eu-west-3.amazonaws.com/aapl_stock.csv') limit 10''') $$ ======= The related logs: ======= 2023-12-04 13:36:28.086 UTC [3202531] LOG: server process (PID 3216826) was terminated by signal 6: Aborted 2023-12-04 13:36:28.086 UTC [3202531] DETAIL: Failed process was running: do language plpython3u $$ import chdb chdb.query(sql='''select * from s3('https://datasets-documentation.s3.eu-west-3.amazonaws.com/aapl_stock.csv') limit 10''') $$ 2023-12-04 13:36:28.086 UTC [3202531] LOG: terminating any other active server processes 2023-12-04 13:36:28.087 UTC [3202531] LOG: all server processes terminated; reinitializing ======= I've experimented just fine with several other features, e.g., queries & file table function. I am not sure if here is the right place to raise the issue. I've reported on the github repo (https://github.com/chdb-io/chdb/issues/139) but it seems not a chdb issue because the query runs fine within a chdb python session. Thanks.
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> The following anonymous block causes a server termination:
> =======
> do language plpython3u $$
> import chdb
> chdb.query(sql='''select * from
> s3('https://datasets-documentation.s3.eu-west-3.amazonaws.com/aapl_stock.csv')
> limit 10''')
> $$
> =======
> The related logs:
> =======
> 2023-12-04 13:36:28.086 UTC [3202531] LOG: server process (PID 3216826) was
> terminated by signal 6: Aborted
The useful details would have appeared *before* this message.
Look for TRAP: lines, or possibly python-generated messages.
(This could easily have been a python-internal abort, rather
than anything Postgres did.) Also there might be a stack trace.
regards, tom lane