Обсуждение: pgsql: Improve BRIN minmax-multi opclass test coverage

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

pgsql: Improve BRIN minmax-multi opclass test coverage

От
Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Improve BRIN minmax-multi opclass test coverage

Per the code coverage report, the existing regression tests did not
exercice some a couple important BRIN minmax-multi code paths.

- The tests focused on testing planning with a range of scan key
  strategies, but not the execution. Fixed by adding queries that
  actually test query execution for both equality and inequality.

- All tests created indexes after inserting data, but this only
  exercises the CREATE INDEX strategy that sees all values at once, not
  incremental summary updates. The new tests flip the order and create
  the index before adding data.

- The assert check(s) validating correctness of expanded ranges were
  present only in the "union" code path, which is not covered by
  regression tests at all (as it requires concurrency etc.). Fixed by
  adding the asserts to a couple more places.

Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/57020b2e-d9c9-9bc7-4892-b36d9bb07563%40enterprisedb.com

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0457109344b46f481f9bf09b85674695ba57c8e4

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax_multi.c |   9 +
src/test/regress/expected/brin_multi.out    | 357 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/test/regress/sql/brin_multi.sql         | 165 +++++++++++++
3 files changed, 531 insertions(+)


Re: pgsql: Improve BRIN minmax-multi opclass test coverage

От
Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
These new tests introduced a few new calls of the md5() function.  This 
should be avoided (see commit 208bf364a9).  You can replace these easily 
with the fipshash() function instead, but I think you then also need to 
change some of the constants in the tests.  Could you look at this again?


On 02.07.23 10:34, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Improve BRIN minmax-multi opclass test coverage
> 
> Per the code coverage report, the existing regression tests did not
> exercice some a couple important BRIN minmax-multi code paths.
> 
> - The tests focused on testing planning with a range of scan key
>    strategies, but not the execution. Fixed by adding queries that
>    actually test query execution for both equality and inequality.
> 
> - All tests created indexes after inserting data, but this only
>    exercises the CREATE INDEX strategy that sees all values at once, not
>    incremental summary updates. The new tests flip the order and create
>    the index before adding data.
> 
> - The assert check(s) validating correctness of expanded ranges were
>    present only in the "union" code path, which is not covered by
>    regression tests at all (as it requires concurrency etc.). Fixed by
>    adding the asserts to a couple more places.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas
> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/57020b2e-d9c9-9bc7-4892-b36d9bb07563%40enterprisedb.com
> 
> Branch
> ------
> master
> 
> Details
> -------
> https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0457109344b46f481f9bf09b85674695ba57c8e4
> 
> Modified Files
> --------------
> src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax_multi.c |   9 +
> src/test/regress/expected/brin_multi.out    | 357 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> src/test/regress/sql/brin_multi.sql         | 165 +++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 531 insertions(+)
> 




Re: pgsql: Improve BRIN minmax-multi opclass test coverage

От
Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
On 22.08.23 08:43, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> These new tests introduced a few new calls of the md5() function.  This 
> should be avoided (see commit 208bf364a9).  You can replace these easily 
> with the fipshash() function instead, but I think you then also need to 
> change some of the constants in the tests.  Could you look at this again?

I have created a patch that updates the test accordingly.  It replaces 
the md5() function with fipshash() and adjusts the test values to 
correspond to the values generated in the original tests.

Вложения