Обсуждение: Synchronous Multimaster Replication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Synchronous Multimaster Replication

От
PG Doc comments form
Дата:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/different-replication-solutions.html
Description:

Not sure if this is an error but I was wondering about this sentence: "In
fact, write performance is often worse than that of a single server". Isn't
syncronous multimaster write performance always (rather than "often") worse
than that of a single (non-distributed) server?

Re: Synchronous Multimaster Replication

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 04:37:18PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> 
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/different-replication-solutions.html
> Description:
> 
> Not sure if this is an error but I was wondering about this sentence: "In
> fact, write performance is often worse than that of a single server". Isn't
> syncronous multimaster write performance always (rather than "often") worse
> than that of a single (non-distributed) server?

Very good point. I have improved the text with the attached patch.  I
also clarified the asynchronous case.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Вложения

Re: Synchronous Multimaster Replication

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 09:47:40AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 04:37:18PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> > 
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/different-replication-solutions.html
> > Description:
> > 
> > Not sure if this is an error but I was wondering about this sentence: "In
> > fact, write performance is often worse than that of a single server". Isn't
> > syncronous multimaster write performance always (rather than "often") worse
> > than that of a single (non-distributed) server?
> 
> Very good point. I have improved the text with the attached patch.  I
> also clarified the asynchronous case.

Patch applied thorough all current versions of the Postgres docs. 
Thanks for the report.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +