Hi, thanks for the response.
First of all I am a simple user who likes reading only the different
content of the manual every time a new version comes up.
So, what I want to do is to create the pg11.html file, next pg11.text
file to compare it with pg10.x.text file (pg.org unfortunately stopped
providing text files).
The method I have followed is the same with that I did for 10.3 &
10.4. But it didn't work for 10.5 and now for 11.
What I get is:
config.status: ... yes|ok|no|other (no warning, no error)
...
sed: -e expression #1, char 404: unknown option to `s'
config.status: creating src/Makefile.global (file
size zero "0" ie empty!)
sed: -e expression #1, char 420: unknown option to `s'
...
config.status: ... (no warning, no error)
I am trying to build only the html and text documentation files. I
have been following the instructions given in "J.3. Building The
Documentation".
Please, if possible, advise accurate instructions for newbiees!
Tia
On 10/19/18, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> GPT <gptmailinglists@gmail.com> writes:
>> I have followed the following steps but I have failed to create the
>> doc for PG11.
>
>> cd .../postgresql-11
>> ./configure
>> cd ../postgresql-11/doc/src/sgml
>
> The above seems a bit confused. Are you trying to do a VPATH build?
> If so, you need to run configure in the build tree, not the source tree.
> That is, I'd have expected something more like
>
> cd ...buildtree...
> ../sourcetree/configure
> cd doc/src/sgml
>
>> make check
>
> You probably want "make" or "make all"; "make check" won't actually
> build anything. However, that's not related to this problem:
>
>> I get the following error:
>> make: *** No rule to make target '/configure', needed by 'version.sgml'.
>> Stop.
>
> Looking at the makefile, it's clear that $(top_srcdir) is expanding
> to empty. I'm not quite seeing how Makefile.global would end up
> doing that, but perhaps it's confused about vpath vs regular build.
> Another theory is that configure went wrong somehow and inserted
> bogus values into Makefile.global; was there any sign of distress
> while running configure?
>
> regards, tom lane
>