Обсуждение: ts_rewrite in 10.4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

ts_rewrite in 10.4

От
Douglas Doole
Дата:
As I was double checking that the new function marking from 10.4 merged correctly to our fork, I noticed that one of the ts_rewrite entries looks wrong.

The release notes say:
ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.ts_rewrite(tsquery, tsquery, tsquery) PARALLEL UNSAFE;

But when I pull pg_proc.h from 10.4, I find:
DATA(insert OID = 3684 (  ts_rewrite PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 0 f f f f t f i s 3 0 3615 "3615 3615 3615" ...

Which I think means the function is still marked parallel safe. Am I missing something?

- Doug
Salesforce

Re: ts_rewrite in 10.4

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Douglas Doole <dougdoole@gmail.com> writes:
> The release notes say:
> ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.ts_rewrite(tsquery, tsquery, tsquery) PARALLEL
> UNSAFE;

> But when I pull pg_proc.h from 10.4, I find:
> DATA(insert OID = 3684 (  ts_rewrite PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 0 f f f f t f i s
> 3 0 3615 "3615 3615 3615" ...

> Which I think means the function is still marked parallel safe. Am I
> missing something?

Oh ... that's a mistake in the release notes :-(.  The 3-argument form of
ts_rewrite doesn't execute any user-supplied query; AFAICS it's not any
less safe than anything else.  The 2-argument form runs a user-supplied
query string, and *does* need to be marked unsafe.  So the patch got
it right, but then we got confused while making the notes.

            regards, tom lane

Re: ts_rewrite in 10.4

От
"Jonathan S. Katz"
Дата:
> On May 10, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Douglas Doole <dougdoole@gmail.com> writes:
>> The release notes say:
>> ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.ts_rewrite(tsquery, tsquery, tsquery) PARALLEL
>> UNSAFE;
>
>> But when I pull pg_proc.h from 10.4, I find:
>> DATA(insert OID = 3684 (  ts_rewrite PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 0 f f f f t f i s
>> 3 0 3615 "3615 3615 3615" ...
>
>> Which I think means the function is still marked parallel safe. Am I
>> missing something?
>
> Oh ... that's a mistake in the release notes :-(.  The 3-argument form of
> ts_rewrite doesn't execute any user-supplied query; AFAICS it's not any
> less safe than anything else.  The 2-argument form runs a user-supplied
> query string, and *does* need to be marked unsafe.  So the patch got
> it right, but then we got confused while making the notes.

Updated notes in news section.  Unfortunately too late to update email :(

Thanks,

Jonathan