Обсуждение: Some localizable files are absent on https://babel.postgresql.org/

On 12/21/16 3:12 AM, Alexander Law wrote:
> Please consider adding to https://babel.postgresql.org/ the following
> .pot files for translation:
> /src/bin/pg_test_timing/po/pg_test_timing.pot//
> //src/bin/pg_upgrade/po/pg_upgrade.pot//
> //src/bin/pg_xlogdump/po/pg_xlogdump.pot//
> //src/bin/pg_archivecleanup/po/pg_archivecleanup.pot//
> //src/bin/pg_test_fsync/po/pg_test_fsync.pot/

We haven't branched that repository between 9.6 and 10 yet.

We could do that now, if there is interest in getting started on the
above.  Or otherwise we could do it after the minor releases in February.

--
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Hello Peter,
It would be nice, I could translate these files to Russian before February.
Btw, what is your opinion regarding contrib localizations?
I found that with minor modifications we can get some extensions
localizeable.
For example, see attached patch for file_fdfw.
Having the patch applied I can do `make update-po -C contrib` and get
contrib/file_fdw/po/*.pot , *.po for translation.
And postgres uses my translation when I compile translated messages and
place it in the LC_MESSAGES directory.
So I see no technical issues with translating contrib modules.
Maybe they should be maintained on https://babel.postgresql.org/ too?

Best regards,
Alexander

23.12.2016 18:06, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/21/16 3:12 AM, Alexander Law wrote:
>> Please consider adding to https://babel.postgresql.org/ the following
>> .pot files for translation:
>> /src/bin/pg_test_timing/po/pg_test_timing.pot//
>> //src/bin/pg_upgrade/po/pg_upgrade.pot//
>> //src/bin/pg_xlogdump/po/pg_xlogdump.pot//
>> //src/bin/pg_archivecleanup/po/pg_archivecleanup.pot//
>> //src/bin/pg_test_fsync/po/pg_test_fsync.pot/
> We haven't branched that repository between 9.6 and 10 yet.
>
> We could do that now, if there is interest in getting started on the
> above.  Or otherwise we could do it after the minor releases in February.
>

On 12/23/16 10:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> We haven't branched that repository between 9.6 and 10 yet.
>
> We could do that now, if there is interest in getting started on the
> above.  Or otherwise we could do it after the minor releases in February.

I have done the branching now.

--
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services