Make OWNER TO subcommand mention consistent
We say 'OWNER TO' in the synopsis; let's use that form elsewhere.
There is a paragraph in the <note> section that refers to various
subcommands very loosely (including OWNER); I didn't think it was an
improvement to change that one.
This is a fairly inconsequential change, so no backpatch.
Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/69ec7b51-03e5-f523-95ce-c070ee790e70@lab.ntt.co.jp
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/bf54c0f05c0a58db17627724a83e1b6d4ec2712c
Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers