Обсуждение: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix problems related to RangeTblEntry members enrname andenrtup
[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix problems related to RangeTblEntry members enrname andenrtup
От
Robert Haas
Дата:
Fix problems related to RangeTblEntry members enrname and enrtuples. Commit 18ce3a4ab22d2984f8540ab480979c851dae5338 failed to update the comments in parsenodes.h for the new members, and made only incomplete updates to src/backend/nodes Thomas Munro, per a report from Noah Misch. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20170611062525.GA1628882@rfd.leadboat.com Branch ------ master Details ------- https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f32d57fd7088a558dadbe21b9859b09d2f877c19 Modified Files -------------- src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c | 3 ++- src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c | 2 ++ src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c | 1 + src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c | 1 + src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h | 14 +++++++++++++- 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> writes:
> Fix problems related to RangeTblEntry members enrname and enrtuples.
> Commit 18ce3a4ab22d2984f8540ab480979c851dae5338 failed to update
> the comments in parsenodes.h for the new members, and made only
> incomplete updates to src/backend/nodes
This really should have involved a catversion bump. But we just
had one earlier today, so in practice it might not matter.
regards, tom lane
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> writes: >> Fix problems related to RangeTblEntry members enrname and enrtuples. >> Commit 18ce3a4ab22d2984f8540ab480979c851dae5338 failed to update >> the comments in parsenodes.h for the new members, and made only >> incomplete updates to src/backend/nodes > > This really should have involved a catversion bump. But we just > had one earlier today, so in practice it might not matter. Oh, because of stored rules using the old RangeTblEntry serialization format? Sorry, I totally missed that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This really should have involved a catversion bump. But we just
>> had one earlier today, so in practice it might not matter.
> Oh, because of stored rules using the old RangeTblEntry serialization
> format? Sorry, I totally missed that.
Yeah, exactly. In practice I'm not sure a stored rule/view could contain
an RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE RangeTblEntry, but if it did, there'd be a problem.
regards, tom lane
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> This really should have involved a catversion bump. But we just >>> had one earlier today, so in practice it might not matter. > >> Oh, because of stored rules using the old RangeTblEntry serialization >> format? Sorry, I totally missed that. > > Yeah, exactly. In practice I'm not sure a stored rule/view could contain > an RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE RangeTblEntry, but if it did, there'd be a problem. I think that's not possible, so we're probably fine, even apart from the fact that we've bumped catversion multiple times since beta1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company