Обсуждение: Please stop approving obvious spam...
Whoever approved this was asleep at the switch; and the same for the
spam from the same address a few days ago in pgsql-admin.
(I assume from the timestamps that it was moderated, and the
source address isn't actually subscribed.)
regards, tom lane
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 07:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: yj2133011 <274040551@qq.com>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] On-disk size of db increased after restore
http://www.tomtop.com/home-garden/werkzeuge/digital-scales.html Digital
Scales for any application. Wholesale digital scale pricing available.
American
http://www.tomtop.com/20g40kg-digital-hanging-luggage-fishing-weight-scale_p11432.html
Weight Scales has what you need.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/On-disk-size-of-db-increased-after-restore-tp2798698p2803475.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
------- End of Forwarded Message
On 4 September 2010 19:14, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Whoever approved this was asleep at the switch; and the same for the > spam from the same address a few days ago in pgsql-admin. > > (I assume from the timestamps that it was moderated, and the > source address isn't actually subscribed.) I haven't got access to the list to check the email address, but yes, I'm pretty sure that was moderated. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 21:49, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > On 4 September 2010 19:14, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Whoever approved this was asleep at the switch; and the same for the >> spam from the same address a few days ago in pgsql-admin. >> >> (I assume from the timestamps that it was moderated, and the >> source address isn't actually subscribed.) > > I haven't got access to the list to check the email address, but yes, > I'm pretty sure that was moderated. I just checked the moderation queue of -hackers, which had about 40 unmoderated messages (all but three was spam). Well over half of these were messages that were spam but that looked like responses to proper thread (subject line actually active on the lists within the past day or two). My guess is somebody got slightly trigger-happy and only checked the subject and not the contents. AFAIK, this is a new "type" of spam that hasn't shown up before - at least I haven't seen it. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
On 6 September 2010 08:42, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 21:49, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >> On 4 September 2010 19:14, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Whoever approved this was asleep at the switch; and the same for the >>> spam from the same address a few days ago in pgsql-admin. >>> >>> (I assume from the timestamps that it was moderated, and the >>> source address isn't actually subscribed.) >> >> I haven't got access to the list to check the email address, but yes, >> I'm pretty sure that was moderated. > > I just checked the moderation queue of -hackers, which had about 40 > unmoderated messages (all but three was spam). Well over half of these > were messages that were spam but that looked like responses to proper > thread (subject line actually active on the lists within the past day > or two). My guess is somebody got slightly trigger-happy and only > checked the subject and not the contents. AFAIK, this is a new "type" > of spam that hasn't shown up before - at least I haven't seen it. I don't mind taking on more moderation if it becomes necessary. I tend to moderate as they come in (when I'm awake obviously). -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935