Обсуждение: using domain types with ODBC, esp. lo
In my schema definitions, I usually don't use basic datatypes, but self defined domains. This seems to work in general, but I encountered problems with blobs. I'm using CREATE DOMAIN t_image AS lo; While inserting data isn't sensitive to domains, selecting won't work. The reason is that the row's datatype obtained with CI_read_fields is compared to lo's oid. t_image's oid is different, so the column is handled wrong. This means, that at the moment domains are not usable on lo columns with ODBC. As a workaround, the driver could maintain an internal list of domain's oids, mapping them to lo's oid when CI_read_fields detects one. There might be another flaw inside CI_read_fields. The well-known data types PG_TYPE_DATETIME, PG_TYPE_TIMESTAMP_NO_TMZONE, PG_TYPE_TIME, PT_TYPE_TIME_WITH_TMZONE are handled in a special way concerning the atttypmod field. This will fail for domain types of that base type. Actually, best thing for this problems would be if the backend would deliver the base type oid, not the user type oid. And lo could be hard-coded to the backend too... :-) Regards, Andreas
Andreas Pflug <Andreas.Pflug@web.de> writes: > The well-known data types PG_TYPE_DATETIME, PG_TYPE_TIMESTAMP_NO_TMZONE, > PG_TYPE_TIME, PT_TYPE_TIME_WITH_TMZONE are handled in a special way > concerning the atttypmod field. This will fail for domain types of that > base type. This is correct, since the domain won't expose the atttypmod it assigns to the underlying type. > Actually, best thing for this problems would be if the backend would > deliver the base type oid, not the user type oid. There was some discussion of that idea in pgsql-hackers last week, but we didn't come to a definite conclusion. How do others feel about it? regards, tom lane
> > >There was some discussion of that idea in pgsql-hackers last week, but >we didn't come to a definite conclusion. How do others feel about it? > > regards, tom lane > > I think there a several ways: - base type OID instead of user type OID. Might break some clients dealing with special types. ODBC users won't notice. - a postgresql.conf option to tell the backend to use base type OID or user type OID. Would catch most cases. - a connection specific setting to tell the backend to use base type OID or user type OID. For concurrent ODBC and weird clients use. - base type additionally in the RowDescription message. Obviously, this would break the 7.3 protocol. Regards, Andreas